Which is better directly? If you play as arty, you’re showing off your single digit IQ level. Simeon85 8 Posted 06 November – The gun isn’t great, it hits pretty hard but has to be aimed against any tier 9 or 10 with armour or it will bounce ALOT. You had the E3 during the beta? Initiated on December 3, , the T mm heavy tank project began Estes. From what I can tell, it basically has the same gun as the E3 while giving up armor for better mobility and a semi-turret, but I’m curious just how well the armor holds up.
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
Simeon85 13 Posted 06 November – While the T30 is better at bouncing shots off its turret, the E4 gets more bounces off the lower hull, although there is something to be said for having a degree rotating turret. The causes for these divergences in the game are normally not disclosed and may be rooted in game balance. Only ask as Prem rounds where the choice of round against it so assumed it was that. First and foremost, the TE4 only has any real armour on the front — the sides and the rear are very weak and have a high chance of sustaining module damage when shot, especially the engine and ammo rack.
Search Advanced Search section: The TE4 represents the 4th proposal for the T project. Gallant Prime 9 Posted 22 April – I had it towards the closing stages of the beta but never had the problem of people penning easily but I think there were not a lot of people who knew anything about it other than ” ill run in this direction instead “. E3 is easier to play but E4 has way more potential if you know what you are doing. Joe Gunn I 13 Posted 22 April – The initial proposal was rejected as its dimensions would of prohibited the vehicles passage through the Berne International Tunnel, a requirement for the project Hunnicutt.
TheManFromKekistan Feb 09 Gun mantlet its only mm of armor.
T110E3 or T110E4
It’s almost crazy to say but the e4 seems so squishy to me that I will 2nd line if I can. Wof can spam full apcr and make a profit with premium. References Article Pulled from Tankopedia. However, the price of this power is the terrible gun handling, low dpm and the poor gun angles mentioned before. Very large weakspots on turret and hull.
TE4 – Tank Destroyers – World of Tanks official forum
The TE4 can play in large part like a TE5 without the same gun depression, except the owt is so much more dangerous. Pros and Cons Pros: On a more serious note, putting premium tanks aside looking at you G110e4 and FochTE3 and Object 4 are clearly better than the TE4. Secondly, the turret wo is virtually flat, without any sloping even on the front.
Do you remember that short time when it was nerfed to the point that tanks could actually pen its mantle? In order to maximise your performance on the battlefield, we suggest installing the following equipment: I’m happy to discuss this further, if I’m missing something obvious.
That second repair kit is soooo much more useful than the fire extinguisher its barely a choice. Hedgeson 20 Posted Dec 05 – Strong frontal Armour, Better gun handling, accuracy and reload.
I’ve improved with the E3 over the years and have gone from disliking it to feeling OK about it. Nickem 14 Posted 22 April – Don’t think you are impenetrable but don’t be afraid to stick your nose t1110e4. PepperidgeFarmGuy 8 Posted Aug 16 – Its really kind of dumb.
I’ve never played the E3, though I imagine it’s fairly similar to the Badger – which for me can be one of the most fun Tier X tanks for it’s ability to just wade down a flank.